Tylenol is Not As Effective as It Seems When Treating the Flu

In the midst of Flu season people are always looking for a quick remedy to cure their symptoms and stop the flu as quickly as possible. One of the most common flu symptoms is a fever and often to combat the fever people are told to take antipyretics like acetaminophen or Tylenol. A research group in New Zeland studied the effectiveness of antipyretics like paracetamol on treating the flu. They chose this study because creating a fever is a natural and physiological adaptation that happens in the body that is actually a survival benefit. In addition, they chose to do this study because many antipyretics are actually harmful to animals and increase their chances of infection and even mortality.


The study conducted was both double blind and randomized and the participants were between the ages of 18 and 65. Half of the patients were given a placebo and the other half of the patients were given 1 gram of paracetamol four times a day. After a full week of recording the patients symptoms and examining the area under the curve of a PCR viral load it was found that there were 22 participants in the placebo group that were found to have influenza positive-PCR. In addition, 24 participants in the paracetamol group tested positive for PCR influenza. Based on these results, the research study concluded that antipyretics like paracetamol were not effective in treating the flu/flu-like symptoms. Thus the researchers recommended other treatments as no real benefit was seen.


I feel as if studies like this are extremely helpful for all health care professionals to know about. Whether you are a pharmacist, a nurse, a doctor, or just a patient, the flu is so common that it is important that we know how to treat it. I truly believe that many people think treating the flu with medications like this is helpful. Therefore, assignments like this blog show how important it is to keep up on new research and literature so that we can give our patients the best care possible.


Jefferies, S., Braithwaite, I., Walker, S., Weatherall, M., Jennings, L., Luck, M., Barrett, K., Siebers, R., Blackmore, T., Beasley, R., Perrin, K. and Pi Study Group (2016), Randomized controlled trial of the effect of regular paracetamol on influenza infection. Respirology, 21: 370–377.





Less than half of U.S. kids under age two fully vaccinated against flu

Vaccination rates among children under the age of 2 years have been alarmingly low for the past decade, if not more. In the 2011-2012 flu season, only 45 percent of infants aged 7 to 23 months were vaccinated. While compared to the 5 percent rate in 2002-2003, this is step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to continue raising the vaccination rates among infants. In some states, the vaccination rate is as low as 24 percent, meaning that 3 in 4 babies are at risk to influenza. A contributing factor to these low vaccination rates is that for an infant’s first vaccination, they need two doses of the vaccine. Nearly 36 percent of children end up only receiving the first dose and end up not being fully vaccinated.

Pharmacists have already began seeing changes in immunization laws over the past couple years, especially in the restrictions on patient-age. At the beginning of 2015, only 27 states allowed pharmacists to vaccinate patients of any age, while there were 8 states where pharmacists could only vaccinate people older than the age of 18, Pennsylvania being one of them (until June 26th, where a bill was passed lowering the minimum age to 9). These changes can prove to be instrumental in raising vaccination rates across the country. Increasing the access to these immunization services can make a huge impact on the country’s health and encourage more people to stay current on their vaccinations. Hopefully in the near future, legislators will realize the potential of pharmacists immunizing and allow for them to do so all over the country, and not just in select states.

Pediatrics. 2016; 137(3): .